IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/eaeuco/v22y2016i1p85-105n5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Opening the „Black Box” of Organic Agriculture in Bulgaria: the Problem with Top-down Institutional Development

Author

Listed:
  • Stoeva Svetla

    (Sofia University “St. Kliment Ohridski” Department of Sociology, Bulgaria)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine the institutional development of organic agriculture (OA) in Bulgaria. The primary focus is on explaining certain contradictory trends observed during an examination of the phenomenon. First, although the origins of OA in Bulgaria can be traced back to the last years of socialism, it was not until 2010 that a “boom” of organic operators and certified land occurred. Second, although a full range of policies and instruments to support OA have been implemented and the importance of OA has been politically recognised, only approximately 1.1% of the agricultural land in Bulgaria is currently managed organically. Additionally, despite the development of national policies, the introduction of financial instruments and the emergence of OA organisations, the domestic organic food market is backward, as the largest portion of OA production is intended for export. Finally, there is evidence that calls into question the potential of OA to encourage socially and economically productive activities when it is motivated by subsidies rather than market value.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoeva Svetla, 2016. "Opening the „Black Box” of Organic Agriculture in Bulgaria: the Problem with Top-down Institutional Development," Eastern European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 22(1), pages 85-105, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:eaeuco:v:22:y:2016:i:1:p:85-105:n:5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/eec.2016.22.issue-1/eec-2016-0005/eec-2016-0005.xml?format=INT
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:eaeuco:v:22:y:2016:i:1:p:85-105:n:5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.