IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/demode/v8y2020i1p107-118n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The deFinetti representation of generalised Marshall–Olkin sequences

Author

Listed:
  • Sloot Henrik

    (Technical University of Munich, Parkring 11, 85748 Garching-Hochbrück)

Abstract

We show that each infinite exchangeable sequence τ1, τ2, . . . of random variables of the generalised Marshall–Olkin kind can be uniquely linked to an additive subordinator via its deFinetti representation. This is useful for simulation, model estimation, and model building.

Suggested Citation

  • Sloot Henrik, 2020. "The deFinetti representation of generalised Marshall–Olkin sequences," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 107-118, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:demode:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:107-118:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/demo-2020-0006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/demo-2020-0006
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/demo-2020-0006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Embrechts & Marius Hofert, 2013. "A note on generalized inverses," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 77(3), pages 423-432, June.
    2. Marco Scarsini & Pietro Muliere, 1987. "Characterization of a Marshall-Olkin type class of distributions," Post-Print hal-00542248, HAL.
    3. Li, Xiaohu & Pellerey, Franco, 2011. "Generalized Marshall-Olkin distributions and related bivariate aging properties," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(10), pages 1399-1409, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Scherer & Henrik Sloot, 2019. "Exogenous shock models: analytical characterization and probabilistic construction," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 82(8), pages 931-959, November.
    2. Sloot Henrik, 2020. "The deFinetti representation of generalised Marshall–Olkin sequences," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 107-118, January.
    3. Jianhua Lin & Xiaohu Li, 2014. "Multivariate Generalized Marshall–Olkin Distributions and Copulas," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 53-78, March.
    4. Umberto Cherubini & Sabrina Mulinacci, 2021. "Hierarchical Archimedean Dependence in Common Shock Models," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 143-163, March.
    5. Sabrina Mulinacci, 2018. "Archimedean-based Marshall-Olkin Distributions and Related Dependence Structures," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 205-236, March.
    6. Ismaël Mourifié & Marc Henry & Romuald Méango, 2020. "Sharp Bounds and Testability of a Roy Model of STEM Major Choices," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 128(8), pages 3220-3283.
    7. Pellerey, Franco & Shaked, Moshe & Yasaei Sekeh, Salimeh, 2012. "Comparisons of concordance in additive models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 82(11), pages 2059-2067.
    8. Hofert, Marius & McNeil, Alexander J., 2015. "Subadditivity of Value-at-Risk for Bernoulli random variables," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 79-88.
    9. Georg Menz & Moritz Vo{ss}, 2023. "Aggregation of financial markets," Papers 2309.04116, arXiv.org.
    10. Silvana M. Pesenti & Pietro Millossovich & Andreas Tsanakas, 2023. "Differential Sensitivity in Discontinuous Models," Papers 2310.06151, arXiv.org.
    11. Arnold, Sebastian & Molchanov, Ilya & Ziegel, Johanna F., 2020. "Bivariate distributions with ordered marginals," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    12. Barczy, Mátyás & K. Nedényi, Fanni & Sütő, László, 2023. "Probability equivalent level of Value at Risk and higher-order Expected Shortfalls," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 107-128.
    13. Hofert Marius & Memartoluie Amir & Saunders David & Wirjanto Tony, 2017. "Improved algorithms for computing worst Value-at-Risk," Statistics & Risk Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 34(1-2), pages 13-31, June.
    14. Jan-Frederik Mai & Steffen Schenk & Matthias Scherer, 2017. "Two Novel Characterizations of Self-Decomposability on the Half-Line," Journal of Theoretical Probability, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 365-383, March.
    15. Hyunju Lee & Ji Hwan Cha, 2021. "A general multivariate new better than used (MNBU) distribution and its properties," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 84(1), pages 27-46, January.
    16. Haijun Li, 2008. "Tail Dependence Comparison of Survival Marshall–Olkin Copulas," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 39-54, March.
    17. Su, Jianxi & Furman, Edward, 2017. "Multiple risk factor dependence structures: Copulas and related properties," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 109-121.
    18. Basei, Matteo & Ferrari, Giorgio & Rodosthenous, Neofytos, 2023. "Uncertainty over Uncertainty in Environmental Policy Adoption: Bayesian Learning of Unpredictable Socioeconomic Costs," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 677, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    19. Antonis Papapantoleon & Dylan Possamai & Alexandros Saplaouras, 2018. "Stability results for martingale representations: the general case," Papers 1806.01172, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2019.
    20. Matthew Masten & Alexandre Poirier, 2016. "Partial independence in nonseparable models," CeMMAP working papers CWP26/16, Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:demode:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:107-118:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.