IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/coecre/v22y2019i3p7-23n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balkan Candidate Countries Running for Fiscal Consolidation: Legal Frameworks vs. Economic Results

Author

Listed:
  • Stojkova Aleksandra Maksimovska

    (Full-time Professor, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Department of Financial Law, Iustinianus Primus Faculty of Law, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia)

  • Kjoseva Elena Nesovska

    (Assistant Professor, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Department of Financial Law, Iustinianus Primus Faculty of Law, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia)

  • Stojmenovska Irena

    (Assistant Professor, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Department of Financial Law, Iustinianus Primus Faculty of Law, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia)

Abstract

The subject of this paper is four Balkan countries (Albania, Serbia, Macedonia, and Montenegro) that are determined to join the European Union. More particularly, it looks at their work towards accomplishing the political, legal and economic requirements for the EU. Thus, the legislation with the EU Fiscal Compact is the prime focus. Methodologically, the research is based on an assessment of fiscal and monetary legal documents, evaluating the stages of accomplishing the harmonization with the EU’s conditions. Further, cross-section analyses are made by in putting selected indicators; additionally, the authors compare the four countries’ achievements. The EU’s rigorous fiscal rules are being quietly bypassed, but more frequently by existing member states than the candidate states; this statement is founded on legal and economic arguments, with mathematical estimations. Consequently, the authors question the political courage and financial capacity of the examined countries to cope with the fiscal compact of the superior EU 28 members. The answers are supported with numerous analyses of EU Reports for each country, as well as tables and figures that compare the states’ results and economic achievements vs. EU fiscal consolidation rules. The EU 28 average is givenin addition as a comparison. The conclusion gives across analysis between the four countries and the EU 28 member states, with accompanying argumentation to the main statement about the legal and economic developments of the examined Balkan countries as well as a future prognosis.

Suggested Citation

  • Stojkova Aleksandra Maksimovska & Kjoseva Elena Nesovska & Stojmenovska Irena, 2019. "Balkan Candidate Countries Running for Fiscal Consolidation: Legal Frameworks vs. Economic Results," Comparative Economic Research, Sciendo, vol. 22(3), pages 7-23, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:coecre:v:22:y:2019:i:3:p:7-23:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/cer-2019-0020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2019-0020
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/cer-2019-0020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    EU Fiscal Compact; fiscal consolidation; budget deficit; public debt; Balkan candidates;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H3 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents
    • H6 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt
    • H62 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Deficit; Surplus
    • H63 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:coecre:v:22:y:2019:i:3:p:7-23:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.