IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ceuecj/v11y2024i58p79-96n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Single Market Enlargement and Technical Barriers to Trade: Revisiting the Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Hagemejer Jan

    (University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Długa 44/50, 00-241 Warsaw, Poland ; CASE Center for Social and Economic Research, ul. Zamenhofa 5/1b, 00-165 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Matuszczak Łukasz

    (University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Długa 44/50, 00-241 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

EU enlargements have given new EU member states access to the European Single Market. While tariff liberalisation was already completed at the time of enlargement, technical regulations were subject to different sectoral approaches, including harmonisation and mutual recognition. We employ a structural gravity model estimated using sectoral trade data from 1987 to 2020 to assess the trade effects of these measures. We find that trade expansion, particularly exports of the NMS to the incumbent EU members, has been stronger in the sectors covered either by the Old Approach (full harmonisation) or the New Approach (essential requirements) than in sectors covered by mutual recognition. The New Approach has been more effective when coupled with mutual recognition at the sector level than with either approach alone. Our results imply that the TBT harmonisation has had a heterogenous impact on different sectors (the most important for low-tech industries was the Old Approach, while for high-tech, it was the New Approach).

Suggested Citation

  • Hagemejer Jan & Matuszczak Łukasz, 2024. "Single Market Enlargement and Technical Barriers to Trade: Revisiting the Evidence," Central European Economic Journal, Sciendo, vol. 11(58), pages 79-96, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ceuecj:v:11:y:2024:i:58:p:79-96:n:8
    DOI: 10.2478/ceej-2024-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2024-0008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ceej-2024-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    European integration; EU enlargement; gravity model; technical barriers to trade; F13; F02; F52;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F02 - International Economics - - General - - - International Economic Order and Integration
    • F52 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy - - - National Security; Economic Nationalism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ceuecj:v:11:y:2024:i:58:p:79-96:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.