IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/cejopp/v15y2021i5p1-14n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The perception of inter-municipal cooperation by local officials and managers

Author

Listed:
  • Bakoš Eduard
  • Hrůza Filip

    (Masaryk University, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Lipová 41a, 602 00, Brno, Czech Republic, email: bakos@econ.muni.cz)

  • Fiedor David

    (Palacký University Olomouc, Faculty of Arts, tř. Svobody 8, 779 00Olomouc, Czech Republic)

  • Klemešová Kamila Dolák

    (The College of Regional Development and Banking Institute – AMBIS, a.s., Department of Regional Development, Mezírka 775/1, 602 00Brno, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Though the exploration of inter-municipal cooperation (IMC) is very widespread in contemporary literature worldwide, the perception of IMC by municipal officials is rarely examined. We focused this paper on revealing the relationship between the perceptions of municipal public officials and the realized benefits of municipal cooperation. Our research combines primary data from a survey of municipalities engaged in a form of IMC and in-depth interviews of both municipal officials and managers who coordinate IMC. Our survey results show that agreement with the statement that IMC helps solve administrative capacity problems tends to vary with the size of the municipality. This study detected considerable obstacles to IMC use, with one set of respondents indicating that they had tried cooperation and found that it did not yield significant, positive financial or non-financial benefits for them. Our in-depth interviews revealed that strong political leadership and experienced managerial staff can contribute to the development of municipal cooperation. In summary, our research provides evidence supporting the notion that the perception of IMC by municipal officials could be an important precursor to actual IMC use and future development.

Suggested Citation

  • Bakoš Eduard & Hrůza Filip & Fiedor David & Klemešová Kamila Dolák, 2021. "The perception of inter-municipal cooperation by local officials and managers," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:cejopp:v:15:y:2021:i:5:p:1-14:n:2
    DOI: 10.2478/cejpp-2021-0002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2021-0002
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/cejpp-2021-0002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jana Soukopová & Gabriela Vaceková, 2018. "Internal factors of intermunicipal cooperation: what matters most and why?," Local Government Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(1), pages 105-126, January.
    2. Steven Brent Lackey & David Freshwater & Anil Rupasingha, 2002. "Factors Influencing Local Government Cooperation in Rural Areas: Evidence from the Tennessee Valley," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 16(2), pages 138-154, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ki Eun Kang & Kyungha Lee, 2023. "Collaboration and Public Participation for Municipal Growth in Land Economic Development Projects," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 37(2), pages 170-182, May.
    2. Blaeschke, Frédéric & Haug, Peter, 2014. "Does Intermunicipal Cooperation Increase Efficiency? Evidence from the Hessian Wastewater Sector," IWH Discussion Papers 11/2014, Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH).
    3. Ayda Eraydın & Bilge Armatlı Köroğlu & Hilal Erkuş Öztürk & Suna Senem Yaşar, 2008. "Network Governance for Competitiveness: The Role of Policy Networks in the Economic Performance of Settlements in the Izmir Region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(11), pages 2291-2321, October.
    4. Katarína Melichová & Lukáš Varecha, 2020. "Endogenous Political, Institutional, Cultural, and Geographic Determinants of Intermunicipal Cooperation—Evidence from Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Germà Bel & Mildred E. Warner, 2016. "Factors explaining inter-municipal cooperation in service delivery: a meta-regression analysis," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 91-115, April.
    6. Hiroki Baba & Yasushi Asami, 2020. "Estimating the minimal efficient scale and the effect of intermunicipal cooperation on service provision areas for waste treatment in Japan," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 139-158, February.
    7. Ki-Eun Kang & George C. Homsy, 2020. "Make Me a Better Offer: Developer Threats and Regional Competition for Land Development Projects," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 34(1), pages 21-30, February.
    8. Alvin Simms & David Freshwater & Jamie Ward, 2014. "The Rural Economic Capacity Index (RECI)," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 28(4), pages 351-363, November.
    9. Julio C. Zambrano-Gutiérrez & Claudia N. Avellaneda, 2023. "Inter-municipal vs. Inter-governmental Cooperation: Their Impact on International Aid," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 861-881, September.
    10. Marzena Piotrowska-Trybull & Stanislaw Sirko, 2020. "Military Units as Elements of Development Potential of Small and Medium-Sized Cities," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 200-219.
    11. Christian Bergholz & Ivo Bischoff, 2018. "Local council members’ view on intermunicipal cooperation: does office-related self-interest matter?," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(12), pages 1624-1635, December.
    12. Halstead, John M. & Mohr, Robert D. & Deller, Steven C., 2010. "Service Delivery in Rural Municipalities: Privatize, Cooperate, or Go It Alone?," 2010 Annual Meeting, July 25-27, 2010, Denver, Colorado 60991, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Stadtler, Lea & Probst, Gilbert, 2012. "How broker organizations can facilitate public–private partnerships for development," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 32-46.
    14. Stanislaw Sirko & Marzena Piotrowska-Trybull & Henryk Wojtaszek, 2020. "Application of Text Mining in the Analysis of Relations between Military Units and Local Government Units," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 430-447.
    15. Bart Voorn & Marieke van Genugten & Sandra Van Thiel, 2020. "Performance of municipally owned corporations: Determinants and mechanisms," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(2), pages 191-212, June.
    16. Pender, John & Reeder, Richard, 2011. "Impacts of Regional Approaches to Rural Development: Initial Evidence on the Delta Regional Authority," Economic Research Report 262240, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Petr Klusáček & Petr Dvořák & Jakub Trojan, 2023. "Revitalising Rural Spaces: Lessons Learnt from Brownfield Regeneration in a Shrinking Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    18. Victoria Gordon, 2009. "Perceptions of Regional Economic Development: Can Win—Lose Become Win—Win?," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 23(4), pages 317-328, November.
    19. Linda Christie & Kenneth Gibb, 2015. "A collaborative approach to event-led regeneration: The governance of legacy from the 2014 Commonwealth Games," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(8), pages 871-887, December.
    20. Agiamoh Rosaline Georgevna, 2021. "Inter-Regional Cooperation in Waste Management: New Trends in Moscow and the Moscow Region," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 9-39, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:cejopp:v:15:y:2021:i:5:p:1-14:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.