IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ajinst/v8y2019i1p77-86n8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficiency Comparison of Cryptographic Applications, Match-off-Card vs. Match-on-Card, Using National Biometric eID Card

Author

Listed:
  • Krasniqi Gazmend

    (University of Vlora “Ismail Qemali”, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Vlora, Albania)

  • Filipi Kristaq

    (Polytechnic University of Tirana, Tirana, Albania)

Abstract

Recently, not only the Internet and mobile devices are changing our daily life but also the usage of national biometric card for every government electronic services. Beside citizen authentication these electronic services require users to encrypt and digitally sign their data or documents. Therefore, biometric cards are used as processing devices for cryptographic applications, whereby there are a lot of security aspects required for secure communication, authentication and encryption among them. Those aspects will be tested in different environments, platforms, devices, PCs, mobile devices and smartcards. This paper compares those two processing systems, Match off Card vs. Match on Card, and their efficiency of encryption and signatures on the data used. How different parameters, time and size of test vectors impacts the process and the role they play on the overall system. The derived results will serve us as a guide for using one processing system in certain environment, minding the efficiency of the data.

Suggested Citation

  • Krasniqi Gazmend & Filipi Kristaq, 2019. "Efficiency Comparison of Cryptographic Applications, Match-off-Card vs. Match-on-Card, Using National Biometric eID Card," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 77-86, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ajinst:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:77-86:n:8
    DOI: 10.2478/ajis-2019-0008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/ajis-2019-0008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/ajis-2019-0008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ajinst:v:8:y:2019:i:1:p:77-86:n:8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.