IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/admini/v71y2023i4p73-96n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parliamentary oversight: Oireachtas committees and the Dáil Committee on Public Accounts in the twenty-first century

Author

Listed:
  • Lynch Catherine

    (1 Houses of the Oireachtas Service, Ireland)

Abstract

Strong parliaments hold the government, its departments and the wider public administration to account. Such parliaments are built on strong and active committee systems. For a long time, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) was the only oversight committee consistently in place in the Houses of the Oireachtas. This article explains how the committee system has been gradually expanded and strengthened, and how its remit to oversee the actions of the government is wide. It explains the institutional factors that lead to the continued prominence of the PAC, including how it draws on the expert, independent reports of the Comptroller and Auditor General to conduct its oversight work, while noting that the PAC still faces the same challenges as other committees concerning a wide remit, finite resources and the multiple motivations of its membership. The work of the PAC is described and placed in the context of the financial scrutiny cycle which is being developed in the Houses of the Oireachtas. This is followed by a discussion of how the PAC manages its potentially wide remit to conduct ex post financial scrutiny of public expenditure, and the balance between what is referred to as ‘police-patrol’, rather than ‘fire-alarm’, scrutiny and the procedural changes which are designed to ensure that the PAC (with the authority of the Dáil) can examine and hold actors to account for the expenditure of any public money.

Suggested Citation

  • Lynch Catherine, 2023. "Parliamentary oversight: Oireachtas committees and the Dáil Committee on Public Accounts in the twenty-first century," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 71(4), pages 73-96, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:admini:v:71:y:2023:i:4:p:73-96:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/admin-2023-0026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2023-0026
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/admin-2023-0026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:admini:v:71:y:2023:i:4:p:73-96:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.