IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/admini/v70y2022i3p141-157n1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ireland’s Covid-19 response: Perspectives from science communication

Author

Listed:
  • Fahy Declan

    (School of Communications, Dublin City University, Ireland)

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Fahy Declan, 2022. "Ireland’s Covid-19 response: Perspectives from science communication," Administration, Sciendo, vol. 70(3), pages 141-157, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:admini:v:70:y:2022:i:3:p:141-157:n:1
    DOI: 10.2478/admin-2022-0023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/admin-2022-0023
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/admin-2022-0023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Durant, John, 1994. "What is scientific literacy?," European Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(1), pages 83-89, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hava Ben-Horin & Yael Kali & Tali Tal, 2023. "The Fifth Dimension in Socio-Scientific Reasoning: Promoting Decision-Making about Socio-Scientific Issues in a Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-23, June.
    2. Željko Pavić & Emma Kovačević & Adrijana Šuljok, 2023. "Health literacy, religiosity, and political identification as predictors of vaccination conspiracy beliefs: a test of the deficit and contextual models," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Jennifer Hochschild & Maya Sen, 2015. "Technology Optimism or Pessimism about Genomic Science," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 658(1), pages 236-252, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:admini:v:70:y:2022:i:3:p:141-157:n:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.