IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrn/journl/y2019i1p69-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of the Mineral Composition of Broccoli and Brussels Sprouts Food Waste

Author

Listed:
  • Vanya Zhivkova

    (Department of Commodity Science, University of Economics, Varna, Bulgaria)

  • Denka Zlateva

    (Department of Commodity Science, University of Economics, Varna, Bulgaria)

Abstract

At present, there is a need to develop and implement effective waste management strategies for fruit and vegetables and to find opportunities for their future utilization. Vegetables from the Brassicaceae family have important economic significance and are consumed in many countries worldwide. The purpose of this article is to investigate the mineral composition of the waste portions of broccoli and Brussels sprouts. The establishment of the mineral composition of these wastes would provide guidelines for their further utilization. It was found that in the non-edible parts of broccoli and Brussels sprouts the highest content is that of potassium – respectively 3880 mg/kg in Brussels sprouts and 3254 mg/kg in broccoli, sulfur (1695 mg/kg in wastes from broccoli, and 1187 mg/kg in wastes from Brussels sprouts) and phosphorus – 1216 mg/kg in broccoli wastes and 686 mg/kg in Brussels sprouts wastes. The following elements in the reduction of their contents are: calcium, magnesium, sodium, iron, copper, zinc, boron, manganese, aluminum.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanya Zhivkova & Denka Zlateva, 2019. "Study of the Mineral Composition of Broccoli and Brussels Sprouts Food Waste," Business & Management Compass, University of Economics Varna, issue 1, pages 69-80.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrn:journl:y:2019:i:1:p:69-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journal.ue-varna.bg/uploads/20190517094325_6133212795cde823d47740.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    food waste; broccoli; Brussels sprouts; mineral composition;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q10 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrn:journl:y:2019:i:1:p:69-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yana Doneva (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevarbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.