IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrn/cfdide/y2020i1p537-549.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Bank Scoring (Ebs) As A Method To Quantify The Commercial Bank'S Commitment To Environmental And Climate Protection - Example Of The Polish Banking Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Pawel Niedziolka

    (Warsaw School of Economics)

Abstract

The original contribution of this study is the proposal of the EBS methodology and the conclusions of its calculation based onthe results of 13 largest banks in Poland in 2018. The most important of these are: ?global banks represent higher values of EBS than domestic ones,?banks with a dominant share of State capital have a lower level of EBS than private banks of a similar scale of activity, ?relationship between the scale of the bank and EBS and bank‘s standing and EBS cannot be established.

Suggested Citation

  • Pawel Niedziolka, 2020. "Environmental Bank Scoring (Ebs) As A Method To Quantify The Commercial Bank'S Commitment To Environmental And Climate Protection - Example Of The Polish Banking Sector," Economic Science, education and the real economy: Development and interactions in the digital age, Publishing house Science and Economics Varna, issue 1, pages 537-549.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrn:cfdide:y:2020:i:1:p:537-549
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ue-varna.bg/~uevarna/uploads/filemanager/303/publishing-complex/2020/Economic_science_education_real_economy_T2_2020.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    environmental risk; financial stability; banking sector;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrn:cfdide:y:2020:i:1:p:537-549. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Zoya Mladenova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevarbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.