IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vra/journl/v8y2019i2p130-139.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Alternative Insurance Solutions - from Cause to Effect

Author

Listed:
  • Stoyan Kirov

    (University of Economics - Varna)

Abstract

The modern markets offer a huge variety of forms of risk management that build on functional parameters of traditional insurance products bringing them seriously compete. The increasing convergence of the capital, banking and insurance markets creates prerequisites for occurrence of new and new alternative solutions. Through them, companies have the opportunity to optimize their risk more efficiently, profitably and adaptively. It turns out that the market for alternative insurance solutions is growing at a rate greater than that of traditional insurance. There are many reasons for this expansionist development but perhaps most important among them is their potential to ensure the operating income of the companies rather than to focus on the physical damage from emerging risks. A natural disaster can round company property and not harm it but it can still put the company at a disadvantage in the context of a deteriorating overall market environment. The damaged infrastructure, delayed deliveries, redirection of savings and other consequences of a disaster can hinder an enterprise's sales even though the company is not in the role of an injured party. In this sense alternative insurance decisions should not be treated only as a transfer of risk but as an integral part of doing a profitable business. They can be an incentive for insurers to engage in product innovations, reduce their prices and pay attention to indirect damage, which is sometimes much more dangerous for companies. Considering the rapid development of alternative insurance markets this report seeks to argue their usefulness for corporate business and to dispel the myth that new opportunities are only a phenomenon of American practice. The regulatory harmonization, product innovation, digitalization of the environment and liberalization of supervision have blurred market boundaries globally and made alternative solutions accessible to all European companies. The author strongly supports the idea that alternative risk transfers that are not yet sufficiently recognizable in Europe, especially for small and medium-sized businesses, should be promoted. Increasing risk literacy and attracting qualified stuff are future directions for development because only through them the new opportunities will be mastered. Although alternative insurance solutions are a trademark for large companies they are fully suitable for all market participants. In addition, they can be successfully combined with traditional insurance if their holders do not trust the alternative instruments or have no experience in absorbing them. The diversification approach will be costlier but it will allow to overcome the disadvantages of both forms of risk transfer.

Suggested Citation

  • Stoyan Kirov, 2019. "The Alternative Insurance Solutions - from Cause to Effect," Izvestia Journal of the Union of Scientists - Varna. Economic Sciences Series, Union of Scientists - Varna, Economic Sciences Section, vol. 8(2), pages 130-139, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:vra:journl:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:130-139
    DOI: 10.36997/IJUSV-ESS/2019.8.2.130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://su-varna.org/journal/IJUSV-ESS/2019.8.2/130-139.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36997/IJUSV-ESS/2019.8.2.130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bertrand Venard & David Cummins, 2007. "Handbook of international insurance. Between global dynamics and local contingencies," Post-Print hal-00778917, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaap Bikker & Adelina Popescu, 2014. "Efficiency and competition in the Dutch non-life insurance industry: Effects of the 2006 health care reform," Working Papers 14-12, Utrecht School of Economics.
    2. Immacolata Marino & Filippo Pericoli & Luigi Ventura, 2011. "Tax Incentives and Household Investment in Complementary Pension Insurance: Some Recent Evidence From the Italian Experience," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 14(2), pages 247-263, September.
    3. Benjamin Lorent, 2010. "Insurance Solvency Regulation: Regulatory Approaches Compared," Working Papers CEB 10-041, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Radoslav Raykov, 2014. "Uncertain Costs and Vertical Differentiation in an Insurance Duopoly," Staff Working Papers 14-14, Bank of Canada.
    5. Patricia H. Born & Barbara Klimaszewski-Blettner, 2013. "Should I Stay or Should I Go? The Impact of Natural Disasters and Regulation on U.S. Property Insurers’ Supply Decisions," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 80(1), pages 1-36, March.
    6. Ning Wang & Yiling Deng, 2016. "Market responses to loss shocks and insurers' post-catastrophe performance in the US property-casualty insurance market," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(3), pages 231-246.
    7. Sajid Mohy Ul Din & Arpah Abu-Bakar & Angappan Regupathi, 2017. "Does insurance promote economic growth: A comparative study of developed and emerging/developing economies," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1390029-139, January.
    8. Nobuyoshi Yamori & Yoshihiro Asai, 2017. "Great East Japan Earthquake and Risk Management for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises ―How Do Japanese SMEs Prepare against Natural Disasters?-," Discussion Paper Series DP2017-14, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.
    9. Radoslav Raykov, 2015. "Catastrophe insurance equilibrium with correlated claims," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 78(1), pages 89-115, January.
    10. Bertrand Venard & Martin Halek & Mark S. Dorfman, 2008. "The Hungarian Insurance Market: Economic Transition in the Insurance Sector," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 11(2), pages 377-396, September.
    11. Siddharth Kumar & Naresh Chandra Sahu & Pushp Kumar, 2020. "Insurance Consumption and Economic Growth in the Post-Liberalized India: An Empirical Analysis," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(2), pages 218-228, February.
    12. Monika Wieczorek-Kosmala, 2019. "The Concept of Risk Capital and Its Application in Non-Financial Companies: A Sustainable Dimension," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Asai, Yoshihiro, 2019. "Why do small and medium enterprises (SMEs) demand property liability insurance?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 298-304.
    14. Li, Jackie & Haberman, Steven, 2015. "On the effectiveness of natural hedging for insurance companies and pension plans," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 286-297.
    15. Rubio-Misas, María, 2009. "Productividad y eficiencia de las Mutualidades de Previsión Social/Productivity and Efficiency of Social Benefit Institutions," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 27, pages 571(30á)-57, Agosto.
    16. Cummins, J. David & Xie, Xiaoying, 2008. "Mergers and acquisitions in the US property-liability insurance industry: Productivity and efficiency effects," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 30-55, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    insurance solutions; alternative risk transfer; captive; risk retention; ART products; self-insurance.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G22 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Insurance; Insurance Companies; Actuarial Studies
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vra:journl:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:130-139. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Pavel Petrov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/uevecea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.