IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/voj/journl/v65y2018i3p319-337id516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutionalist versus Neoclassical View on Income Distribution and Economic Progress: The OECD Panel Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Kosta Josifidis
  • Novica Supić

Abstract

Institutionalist and neoclassical views on income distribution are characterized by different assumptions about the inequality - savings - economic progress relationship. By questioning the neoclassical arguments, the paper promotes the attitude that economic progress results not from savings as “abstain from current consumption” but from society’s ability to continuously develop technological arts and crafts. Empirical analysis of panel data from OECD countries using a dynamic GMM model shows a positive relationship between income concentration and aggregate savings, but there is no robust evidence of a positive relationship between aggregate savings and economic progress. Furthermore, we find robust evidence that technology and human capital are the key determinants of economic progress, implying that accumulation of physical and human capital is more important for economic progress than accumulation of financial capital. Key words: Income inequality, Savings, Economic progress, Old institutionalism, Neoclassical economics. JEL: D31, E21. Institucionalni i neoklasični pogledi na distribuciju dohotka se odlikuju različitim pretpostavkama o nejednakosti, odnos štednja - ekonomski progres. Ispitujući neoklasične argumente, ovaj rad promoviše stav da je ekonomski napredak posledica ne štednje kao “uzdržavanja od tekuće potrošnje” već sposobnosti društva da kontinuirano razvija tehnološku umetnost. Empirijska analiza podataka panela za zemlje OECD-a primenom dinamičkog metoda uopštenih momenata pokazuje pozitivnu vezu izmešu koncentracije dohotka i agregatne štednje, ali nema snažnih dokaza za pozitivnu vezu između agregatne štednje i ekonomskog progresa. Osim toga, utvrdili smo jake dokaze da su tehnologija i ljudski kapital ključne determinante ekonomskog napretka, što implicira da je akumulacija fizičkog i ljudskog kapitala važnija za ekonomski napredak od akumulacije finansijskog kapitala. Ključne reči: Nejednakost dohotka, štednja, ekonomski progres, stari institucionalizam, neoklasična ekonomija.

Suggested Citation

  • Kosta Josifidis & Novica Supić, 2018. "Institutionalist versus Neoclassical View on Income Distribution and Economic Progress: The OECD Panel Evidence," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 65(3), pages 319-337.
  • Handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:65:y:2018:i:3:p:319-337:id:516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/article/view/516/495
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Income inequality; Savings; Economic progress; Old institutionalism; Neoclassical economics;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D31 - Microeconomics - - Distribution - - - Personal Income and Wealth Distribution
    • E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:65:y:2018:i:3:p:319-337:id:516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivana Horvat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.