IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/voj/journl/v65y2018i1p95-115id398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Sovereign Ratings by CRAs Consistent?

Author

Listed:
  • Saka Hami
  • Mehmet Orhan

Abstract

This study is an attempt to compare and contrast the credit ratings granted by prominent agencies, the so-called Big Three namely S&P, Moody’s and Fitch, that dominate the market. The sovereign ratings are proven to motivate the CDS figures of countries empirically, and low ratings are known to increase the interest paid to liabilities by these countries. We employ the historical data over 1994-2014 on the sovereign ratings of 117 countries to test for whether the ratings assigned by CRAs are significantly different or not, with the help of paired-t and ANOVA tests. Hypothesis test results reveal that such differences are significant for many countries and country groups, suggesting that the ratings by CRAs are not consistent with each other. This is true for BRIC, OECD, and emerging market countries. Extra ANOVA tests that we conducted support our findings. Key words: Credit Rating Agencies, Sovereign Ratings, Rating Discrepancy, Global Financial Crisis, Paired-t Test, ANOVA.JEL: E44,F34, G01, G15, G24, H63. Ova studija je pokušaj upoređivanja i utvrđivanja suprotnosti kreditnih rejtinga koje dodeljuju istaknute agencije, tzv. Velika Trojka, odnosno S&P, Moody’s i Fitch, koje dominiraju na tržištu. Pokazalo se da suvereni rejtinzi motivišu empirijske CDS vrednosti zemalja, a niski rejtinzi povećavaju kamatne obaveze ovih zemalja. Upotrebljavamo istorijske podatke tokom 1994-2014. godine o suverenom rejtingu 117 zemalja kako bi testirali da li su rejtinzi dodeljeni od strane CRA značajno različiti ili ne, uz pomoć uparenih t i ANOVA testova. Rezultati ispitivanja hipoteza pokazuju da su takve razlike značajne za mnoge zemlje i grupe zemalja, što ukazuje na to da rejtinzi dodeljeni od strane CRA nisu konzistentni jedni sa drugima. Ovo važi za zemlje BRIC, OECD i zemlje u razvoju. Dodatni ANOVA testovi koje smo proveli podržavaju naše nalaze. Ključne reči: agencije za kreditni rejting, suvereni rejting, nesaglasnost rejtinga, globalna finansijska kriza, upareni t-test, ANOVA.

Suggested Citation

  • Saka Hami & Mehmet Orhan, 2018. "Are Sovereign Ratings by CRAs Consistent?," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 65(1), pages 95-115.
  • Handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:65:y:2018:i:1:p:95-115:id:398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/article/view/398/380
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Credit Rating Agencies; Sovereign Ratings; Rating Discrepancy; Global Financial Crisis; Paired-t Test; ANOVA;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E44 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
    • F34 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Lending and Debt Problems
    • G01 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Financial Crises
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • G24 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Investment Banking; Venture Capital; Brokerage
    • H63 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:voj:journl:v:65:y:2018:i:1:p:95-115:id:398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ivana Horvat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://panoeconomicus.org/index.php/jorunal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.