IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vep/journl/y2023v131i1p129-165.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Liquidity and Ambiguity: Banks or Asset Markets?

Author

Listed:
  • Jürgen Eichberger

    (Alfred Weber Institute, Department of Economics - University of Heidelberg, Germany)

  • Willy Spanjers

    (Department of Economics, School of Law, Social and Behavioural Sciences - Kingston University, UK)

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of incalculable risk (i.e. ambiguity) on two alternative institutional arrangements for financial intermediation in an economy where consumers face uncertain liquidity needs. The ambiguity the consumers experience is modeled by their degree of confidence in their additive beliefs. The optimal liquidity allocation and two institutional arrangements for implementing this allocation are analyzed: a secondary asset market and a competitive banking sector. For full confidence we obtain the well-known result that consumers prefer the deposit contract offered in the competitive banking sector over the asset market, since the former can provide the optimal cross subsidy for consumers with high liquidity needs. With increasing ambiguity this preference will be reversed: the asset market is preferred, since it avoids inefficient liquidation if the bank reserve holdings turn out to be suboptimal.

Suggested Citation

  • Jürgen Eichberger & Willy Spanjers, 2023. "Liquidity and Ambiguity: Banks or Asset Markets?," Rivista Internazionale di Scienze Sociali, Vita e Pensiero, Pubblicazioni dell'Universita' Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, vol. 131(1), pages 129-165.
    • Handle: RePEc:vep:journl:y:2023:v:131:i:1:p:129-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://riss.vitaepensiero.it/scheda-articolo_digital/jurgen-eichberger-willy-spanjers/liquidity-and-ambiguity-banks-or-asset-markets-000518_2023_0001_0129-395242.html
    Download Restriction: Yes
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Financial institutions; Liquidity; Incalculable risk; Ambiguity; Choquet Expected Utility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D8 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty
    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vep:journl:y:2023:v:131:i:1:p:129-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vep - Vita e Pensiero (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.