IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vaj/journl/v14y2019i2p40-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Highest And Best Use And The Property Rights €“ Does It Make A Difference?

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen F. FANNING
  • Larry T. Wright
  • Rick J. MUENKS

Abstract

Fee simple property rights application in tax appraisal is a continuing debate in the courts and taxing jurisdictions and among appraisers. The debate centers on the valuation assumption of fee simple interest in the appraisal of single-tenant properties like big-box retail. One side of this debate is that the property should be appraised considering its current use, while the other viewpoint is that the property should be appraised with the assumption that it is vacant and available for a secondary use. This article addresses the question of how highest and best use fits in this definitional debate and suggests that a supported and reasoned highest and best use analysis should dictate the methods and approaches applied in the valuation analysis - and not just definitional interpretation that assumes the property is vacant and available for a use. Big-box retail property is used as the example for this article, but other property types, such as drug stores, manufacturing facilities, or any property type that was built for use by the owner-operator, will have similar issues in tax court disputes.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen F. FANNING & Larry T. Wright & Rick J. MUENKS, 2019. "Highest And Best Use And The Property Rights €“ Does It Make A Difference?," The Valuation Journal, The National Association of Authorized Romanian Valuers, vol. 14(2), pages 40-82.
  • Handle: RePEc:vaj:journl:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:40-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L81 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Retail and Wholesale Trade; e-Commerce
    • L85 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Real Estate Services
    • R30 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vaj:journl:v:14:y:2019:i:2:p:40-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefan Alexandru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/anevaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.