IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/landec/v93y2017i4p710-720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Return on Capital and Management Reforms in Norway’s Fisheries

Author

Listed:
  • Rögnvaldur Hannesson

Abstract

Individual transferrable quotas (ITQs) are used in Norway’s fisheries, but only partly and with restrictions on transferability. This paper examines how this has affected return on capital. The return on boat capital in three of four fisheries examined has increased since ITQs were introduced. A part of this increase is due to an increase in value of fish landings, but accounting for that still leaves room for increases due to ITQs. Return on total capital (including quota value) has either stagnated or fallen. This is consistent with the rate of return in ITQ fisheries being comparable with other industries in the long run.

Suggested Citation

  • Rögnvaldur Hannesson, 2017. "Return on Capital and Management Reforms in Norway’s Fisheries," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 93(4), pages 710-720.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:93:y:2017:i:4:p:710-720
    Note: DOI: 10.3368/le.93.4.710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://le.uwpress.org/cgi/reprint/93/4/710
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nils-Arne Ekerhovd & Daniel V. Gordon, 2020. "Profitability, Capacity and Productivity Trends in an Evolving Rights Based Fishery: The Norwegian Purse Seine Fishery," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(3), pages 565-591, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q22 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Fishery
    • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:93:y:2017:i:4:p:710-720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://le.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.