This file is part of IDEAS, which uses RePEc data


[ Papers | Articles | Software | Books | Chapters | Authors | Institutions | JEL Classification | NEP reports | Search | New papers by email | Author registration | Rankings | Volunteers | FAQ | Blog | Help! ]

Demand Side Management Policies for Residential Water Use: Who Bears the Conservation Burden?

Author info | Abstract | Publisher info | Download info | Related research | Statistics
Author Info
Mary E. Renwick
Sandra O. Archibald
Abstract

To assess the potential for urban demand side management (DSM) policies as a water resource management tool, we analyze the extent to which price and alternative policy instruments (such as use and quantity restrictions and subsidies for water efficient technologies) reduce residential demand and their distributional implications by type of household. Using detailed household-level panel data for two California communities, the results suggest that the ultimate effects of DSM policies in terms of the reduction in aggregate demand and distribution of water savings among household classes depend both on the policy instrument selected and the composition of aggregate demand.

Download Info
To download:

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. Information about this may be contained in the File-Format links below. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3147117
File Format:
File Function:
Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Publisher Info
Article provided by University of Wisconsin Press in its journal Land Economics.

Volume (Year): 74 (1998)
Issue (Month): 3 ()
Pages: 343-359
Download reference. The following formats are available: HTML (with abstract), plain text (with abstract), BibTeX, RIS (EndNote, RefMan, ProCite), ReDIF
Handle: RePEc:uwp:landec:v:74:y:1998:i:3:p:343-359

Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://le.uwpress.org/

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its listing, contact: ().

Related research
Keywords:

Find related papers by JEL classification:
Q25 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Water

Cited by:
(explanations, Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.)

  1. Olmstead, Sheila & Stavins, Robert, 2008. "Comparing Price and Non-Price Approaches to Urban Water Conservation," Working Paper Series rwp08-034, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  2. Arnaud Reynaud, 2003. "An Econometric Estimation of Industrial Water Demand in France," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 25(2), pages 213-232, June. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  3. Martinez-Espineira, Roberto, 2005. "An Estimation of Residential Water Demand Using Co-Integration and Error Correction Techniques," MPRA Paper 615, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Jan 2006. [Downloadable!]
    Other versions:
  4. Mark Hoffman & Andrew Worthington & Helen Higgs, 2005. "Modelling residential water demand with fixed volumetric charging in a large urban municipality: The case of Brisbane, Australia," School of Economics and Finance Discussion Papers and Working Papers Series 196, School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology. [Downloadable!]
  5. Roberto Martínez-Espiñeira & Céline Nauges, 2004. "Is all domestic water consumption sensitive to price control?," Applied Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 36(15), pages 1697-1703, August. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  6. Leonardo Corral & Anthony Fisher & Nile Hatch, 1999. "Price and Non-Price Influences on Water Conservation: An Econometric Model of Aggregate Demand under Nonlinear Budget Constraint," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series 881, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley. [Downloadable!]
  7. R. Martinez-Espiñeira, 2002. "Residential Water Demand in the Northwest of Spain," Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 21(2), pages 161-187, February. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  8. Erin T. Mansur & Sheila M. Olmstead, 2007. "The Value of Scarce Water: Measuring the Inefficiency of Municipal Regulations," NBER Working Papers 13513, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
  9. Halich, Greg & Stephenson, Kurt & Hilmer, Christiana, 2005. "The Effectiveness of Mandatory and Voluntary Water-Use Restrictions," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19327, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association). [Downloadable!]
  10. R. Quentin Grafton & Tom Kompas & Hang To & Michael Ward, . "Residential Water Consumption: A Cross Country Analysis," Environmental Economics Research Hub Research Reports 0923, Environmental Economics Research Hub, Crawford School, Australian National University. [Downloadable!]
  11. Maria de los Angeles Garcia Valiñas, 2006. "Analysing rationing policies: drought and its effects on urban users’ welfare (Analysing rationing policies during drought)," Applied Economics, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 38(8), pages 955-965, May. [Downloadable!] (restricted)
Statistics
Access and download statistics

Did you know? RePEc data is maintained by each archive holder on its own website. Nothing is held centrally.

This page was last updated on 2009-11-22.


This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Department of Economics, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Connecticut using RePEc data on a server sponsored by the Society for Economic Dynamics.