IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v5y1970i2p208-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Administration of Welfare Budgets: The Views of AFDC Recipients

Author

Listed:
  • Joel F. Handler
  • Ellen Jane Hollingsworth

Abstract

Since income-maintenance is widely conceded to be the heart of the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) program, much attention has focused on the administration of the budget. How is the budget for a family established, and how may it be modified? How often is it changed and under what circumstances? How much caseworker-client interaction is there in the area of budget, and how much friction over the allocation and expenditure of funds? Basing their conclusions on survey data collected from Wisconsin AFDC recipients in six counties, the authors find that budget levels do not fluctuate much, and there is little caseworker intervention in client spending. On the other hand, clients take little advantage of the flexible features for supplementing their budgets, such as Special Needs items, and attempt to get by on their basic monthly checks. If the budget is not a subject of controversy between caseworker and client, or of control over the client by the caseworker, it is due in large part to the lack of discussion between them. Despite paper provisions for extra needs and elaborate provisions for treating earned income of family members, most women operate on budgets that are static, unresponsive, and, at best, minimal.

Suggested Citation

  • Joel F. Handler & Ellen Jane Hollingsworth, 1970. "The Administration of Welfare Budgets: The Views of AFDC Recipients," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 5(2), pages 208-221.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:5:y:1970:i:2:p:208-221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/144899
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:5:y:1970:i:2:p:208-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jhr.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.