IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v3y1968i4p499-514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Apportionment of Funds under the Manpower Development and Training Act of 1962

Author

Listed:
  • Ralph E. Smith

Abstract

Several excellent cost-benefit analyses of programs under the Manpower Development and Training Act have been conducted and reported in the literature. However, little attention has thus far been directed to the method by which federal funds for these training programs are initially apportioned among the states. The major part of the funds for institutional and on-the-job training under Title II, Parts A and B, is made available through an apportionment formula based on criteria set forth in the Act. The present paper describes and evaluates the existing method of apportionment. It is shown that this method contains serious weaknesses which may reduce the effectiveness of the over-all program. Formulas designed to avoid these weaknesses are developed as examples of available alternatives. Using data for fiscal year 1968, the apportionment factors resulting from these alternatives are computed and compared with those resulting from the existing method.

Suggested Citation

  • Ralph E. Smith, 1968. "Apportionment of Funds under the Manpower Development and Training Act of 1962," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 3(4), pages 499-514.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:3:y:1968:i:4:p:499-514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/144800
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:3:y:1968:i:4:p:499-514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jhr.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.