IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v3y1968i2p159-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Nationwide Evaluation of M.D.T.A. Institutional Job Training

Author

Listed:
  • Earl D. Main

Abstract

This evaluation of MDTA institutional job training is based on interviews with a national probability sample of about 1,200 trainees and 1,060 other persons who were unemployed about the same time the training courses started. While the trainees' personal evaluations of their MDTA courses were obtained in considerable detail, the basic purpose of the research was to learn whether the training had any effect on income and employment during the year or more between the training and the interview. Among those who ever held a full-time job since the training period, the MDTA program had no demonstrable effect on income; completers and nontrainees reported about the same weekly wages on their most recent full-time jobs. But more completers than nontrainees were employed when interviewed (78 versus 55 percent), which is probably the main reason for an observed difference in family income. When numerous other variables are controlled in a multiple regression analysis, the net effect of completing MDTA training is estimated to be about $10 a week in family income when interviewed. The mean amount of full-time employment for trainees and non-trainees combined was 55 percent of the period since training. Controlling for several other variables, the net effect of MDTA training on full-time employment is estimated to be between 13 and 23 percent of the period after training for completers (and between 7 and 19 percent for dropouts). Some of the difference is probably due to motivational or other factors not included in the multiple regression analysis. But it appears that the MDTA program does increase employment, even if it does not lead to better paying jobs.

Suggested Citation

  • Earl D. Main, 1968. "A Nationwide Evaluation of M.D.T.A. Institutional Job Training," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 3(2), pages 159-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:3:y:1968:i:2:p:159-170
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/145129
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter H. Rossi & Sonia R. Wright, 1977. "Evaluation Research," Evaluation Review, , vol. 1(1), pages 5-52, February.
    2. Steven M. Director, 1979. "Underadjustment Bias in the Evaluation of Manpower Training," Evaluation Review, , vol. 3(2), pages 190-218, May.
    3. Elkin, Randyl Don, 1971. "An evaluation of benefit-cost analysis as a tool for manpower decision making," ISU General Staff Papers 197101010800005447, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:3:y:1968:i:2:p:159-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jhr.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.