IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uwp/jhriss/v3y1968i1p47-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attrition among Ph.D. Candidates: An Analysis of a Cohort of Recent Woodrow Wilson Fellows

Author

Listed:
  • Joseph D. Mooney

Abstract

Knowledge of the educational, social, and economic factors associated with attrition among graduate students has been very limited to date. This paper attempts to isolate systematically the quantitative importance of a number of explanatory variables for the problem of attrition of doctoral candidates. Sex, field of graduate study, size of graduate school, and academic achievement (but not socioeconomic status of the parents) all seem to have a significant impact on the "success" or "failure" of the graduate students in this sample. For the purposes of this article, "failure" was defined as attendance in graduate school up to six to eight years without acquiring a Ph.D. Mr. Mooney concludes by noting that attempts to expand the number of Ph.D.'s simply by providing more fellowship money will be hampered by certain barriers, social and educational in nature. Since the size of the graduate school bears an inverse relation to the percentage of graduate students acquiring a Ph.D., he argues that existing graduate schools should make a more intensive effort to see to it that more of their present graduate students acquire a Ph.D. rather than simply expanding their enrollments in an attempt to satisfy the demand for more Ph.D.'s.

Suggested Citation

  • Joseph D. Mooney, 1968. "Attrition among Ph.D. Candidates: An Analysis of a Cohort of Recent Woodrow Wilson Fellows," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 3(1), pages 47-62.
  • Handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:3:y:1968:i:1:p:47-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/144647
    Download Restriction: A subscripton is required to access pdf files. Pay per article is available.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David W. Breneman & Dean T. Jamison & Roy Radner, 1976. "The Ph.D. Production Process," NBER Chapters, in: Education as an Industry, pages 1-52, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwp:jhriss:v:3:y:1968:i:1:p:47-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jhr.uwpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.