IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uns/esteco/v36y2019i72p91-115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Los sistemas de gestión predial: diferencias en eficiencia técnica y brechas tecnológicas en los tambos de Uruguay
[Farm management systems: technical Efficiencies differences and technology gap Of uruguay’s dairy farms]

Author

Listed:
  • Federico García Suárez
  • Gabriela Pérez Quesada

Abstract

This study analyzes technological differences between two groups of dairy farms in Uruguay, family and business managed. The meta frontier methodology is applied to estimate and compare technical ef? ciencies between these two groups. Although business managed farms are more technically ef? cient than family farms (0.702 and 0.487, respectively) both groups of farmers could obtain productivity gains improving their technical ef? ciency. Moreover, the two groups are operating under different technology conditions. The estimated average meta technology ratio for BMF is 0.911 and 0.807 for FF. Therefore, BMF should adopt and invest in new technologies to shift the production function upward and reduce the technology gap while FF could try to implement the prevailing practices that are being used by BMF

Suggested Citation

  • Federico García Suárez & Gabriela Pérez Quesada, 2019. "Los sistemas de gestión predial: diferencias en eficiencia técnica y brechas tecnológicas en los tambos de Uruguay [Farm management systems: technical Efficiencies differences and technology gap Of," Estudios Economicos, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Departamento de Economia, vol. 36(72), pages 91-115, january-j.
  • Handle: RePEc:uns:esteco:v:36:y:2019:i:72:p:91-115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.uns.edu.ar/ee/article/view/1661/998
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    e?ciencia técnica; brechas tecnológicas; meta-frontera; producción de leche;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q12 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uns:esteco:v:36:y:2019:i:72:p:91-115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nelly A. José or the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deunsar.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.