IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uje/journl/y2014i1p23-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational And Economic Mechanism Of Property Relations Transformation In The Field Of Reclaimed Farming Under Conditions Of Private Land Ownership

Author

Listed:
  • Leonid Kozhushko

    (National University of Water Management and Nature Recourses Use, Rivne)

  • Olga Mandziuk

    (National University of Water Management and Nature Recourses Use, Rivne)

Abstract

Changes of ownership form in agrarian sector were carried out without taking into account peculiarities of the existing land improvement systems which were used for large collective farms on large land areas. Present land users having large land areas are not able to provide the effective functioning and maintenance of meliorative networks. The amount of water-users have increased considerably but responsibility for proper operation of meliorative systems decreased, the structure of the intrafarm meliorative system have changed, actually, these systems were left without manager. It was decided to transfer the interfarm part of the meliorative network to the balances of enterprises which were legal successors of collective and state farms. The part of the network not transferred was given as municipal property to local authorities. It is difficult for agricultural producers to exploit these networks independently because of the lack of the proper qualification; it is also difficult to be engaged in farming effectively in scopes which are not in accord with the scopes of meliorative network. Despite the large number of studies, they justify the feasibility of establishing associations, in order to preserve the integrity of the use of irrigation networks, but haven't yet developed organizational and economic mechanism that will ensure the effective establishment and regulation of associations on reclaimed lands. The aim of article is to develop organizational and economic mechanism of property relations transformation on reclaimed land and instruments its regulation. The organizational and economic mechanism is a system of interrelated organizational, legal and economic instruments that define and regulate the specific activity or function defined system to ensure its effectiveness and achieve their goals. The organizational-economic mechanism consists of the following blocks: ‰- principles of consistency, comprehensiveness, continuity, efficiency; ‰- regulatory framework which create a legal environment for the operation of agricultural producers' associations, to ensure the establishment and functioning institutional framework; ‰- actors (farmers and village council, the main governing bodies: Parliament, Cabinet of Ministers, the State Water Resources Agency of Ukraine, the Ministry of Agrarian Policy and Food of Ukraine, etc.); ‰- objects (interfarm part of the meliorative network); - institutional environment; ‰- associations of enterprises (cooperatives, associations of water users, corporate contractual associations, joint stock companies); ‰- main levers of regulation (creation of new organizational forms, concession and lease agreements, a system of administrative penalties for degradation of irrigation systems and ecological condition of agricultural land, subsidies and grants, partial or full compensation rates on commercial bank loans, tax relief by reducing the amount land tax, insurance against failure of drainage systems). Performance results are economic efficiency (increase investment attractiveness, increase profitability of products grown on the reclaimed lands), social performance (employment in agriculture, food security) environmental efficiency (improving state lands).

Suggested Citation

  • Leonid Kozhushko & Olga Mandziuk, 2014. "Organizational And Economic Mechanism Of Property Relations Transformation In The Field Of Reclaimed Farming Under Conditions Of Private Land Ownership," Ukrainian Journal Ekonomist, Yuriy Kovalenko, issue 1, pages 23-26, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:uje:journl:y:2014:i:1:p:23-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uje:journl:y:2014:i:1:p:23-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vadym Bardas' (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ua-ekonomist.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.