IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uje/journl/y2013i12p58-60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Efficiency Of Project Solutions During Conducting Of Consolidation Of Lands Of Agricultural Designation

Author

Listed:
  • Anatoliy Shvorak

    (Institute of Land Relations and Environmental Protection Ltd, Lutsk)

Abstract

Cardinal changes of land relations that stated during conducting of land reform in our country determined the new character and content of social and economic problems of land use. Land property and land use of enterprises, companies and citizens in the process of conducting land reform got sufficient drawbacks that hamper production activity and worsen the results of this activity. The most widespread of them are: spatial location; configuration; social and economic; nature and climatic. For substantiated liquidation of drawbacks mentioned above it is necessary to develop projects of consolidation of lands of agricultural purpose simultaneously according to the group of interdependent land properties and land uses. The following methods are necessary to use: exchange of land plots; land rent; cooperation; forming of new or reorganization of existing land properties and land uses. The efficiency of project solutions during conducting consolidation of lands of agricultural designation is determined by such indices: fragmentation level; distance from economic centre; working plots compactness; land tracts uniformity; correlation of expenses for conducting consolidation on 1 hectare of consolidated lands; economic efficiency of consolidation of lands; social efficiency of consolidation of lands; ecological efficiency of consolidation of lands.

Suggested Citation

  • Anatoliy Shvorak, 2013. "Economic Efficiency Of Project Solutions During Conducting Of Consolidation Of Lands Of Agricultural Designation," Ukrainian Journal Ekonomist, Yuriy Kovalenko, issue 12, pages 58-60, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:uje:journl:y:2013:i:12:p:58-60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uje:journl:y:2013:i:12:p:58-60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vadym Bardas' (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://ua-ekonomist.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.