IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/uii/jabisf/v17y2017i2p19-39id10884.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Auditor : Survey Terhadap Auditor Di Yogyakarta

Author

Listed:
  • Abriyani Puspaningsih
  • Noeroel Fadlilah

Abstract

This study aims to examine the accuracy of giving opinion by the auditor. Factors that are expected to have an effect on the accuracy of the auditor's opinion are professional skepticism, experience, audit situation, expertise and workload. This research was conducted by survey method using questionnaires distributed to auditors working in the public accounting firm in Yogyakarta. The sampling technique using a random sampling. The results showed that the variables of professional skepticism and audit situation has significant positive effect on the accuracy of giving opinions by the auditor. There are three variables that do not have a significant effect on the accuracy of giving the auditor's opinion in this study, namely the experience, expertise, and workload. This is because the auditors who were respondents in this study are mostly junior auditor, with an educational background S1 is still a bit of experience, expertise and workload.

Suggested Citation

  • Abriyani Puspaningsih & Noeroel Fadlilah, 2017. "Ketepatan Pemberian Opini Auditor : Survey Terhadap Auditor Di Yogyakarta," Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis, Universitas Islam Indonesia, vol. 17(2), pages 19-39.
    • Handle: RePEc:uii:jabisf:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:19-39:id:10884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JABIS/article/view/10884/8394
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uii:jabisf:v:17:y:2017:i:2:p:19-39:id:10884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ana Yuliani (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JABIS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.