IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/udc/esteco/v45y2018i2p271-299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacto de los instrumentos de promoción de la innovación orientada al sector productivo: El caso de ANII en Uruguay

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Bukstein
  • Elisa Hernández
  • Ximena Usher

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to evaluate the impact of the innovation promotion programs carried by the National Research and Innovation Agency (ANII). A combination of non-experimental methods was used to quantify the effects of public support to innovation in three dimensions of the firms’ behavior: innova-tion investment, innovation results and economic performance. The results show evidence of crowding-in of public support to innovation. Also, beneficiaries of the programs show larger probability of successfully introducing new products and processes. We do not find impact in the economic performance indicators of the firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Bukstein & Elisa Hernández & Ximena Usher, 2018. "Impacto de los instrumentos de promoción de la innovación orientada al sector productivo: El caso de ANII en Uruguay," Estudios de Economia, University of Chile, Department of Economics, vol. 45(2), pages 271-299, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:udc:esteco:v:45:y:2018:i:2:p:271-299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://estudiosdeeconomia.uchile.cl/index.php/EDE/article/view/51351/53734
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Evelyn Calispa & Marcelo Calispa Aguilar & Carlos Serrano Aguiar & Edwin Pozo Safla & Mónica Moreno Barriga & Eduardo García Cabezas & Juan Cayán Martínez, 2023. "Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in South American Most Prosperous Countries: National and Regional Level Perspectives," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Jaureguy, Micaela Vidal & Bianchi, Carlos & Blanchard, Pablo, 2023. "Financial and knowledge barriers to innovation: Complementary and substitution effects on innovative effort," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Impact evaluation; innovation; ANII; Uruguay;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:udc:esteco:v:45:y:2018:i:2:p:271-299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Verónica Kunze (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuclcl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.