Author
Listed:
- Edward L. Glaeser
- Caitlin S. Gorback
- James M. Poterba
Abstract
Pigouvian taxes and user fees can address environmental externalities and efficiently fund transportation infrastructure, but these policies may place burdens on poorer households. This paper presents new evidence on the distributional consequences of the gasoline tax, bus and light-rail charges, and a vehicle miles traveled (VMT) tax. Gas taxes have become more regressive over time, partially because of environmentally oriented technological change, although the share of expenditures on gas taxes declines with expenditures much less than the share of income spent on gas taxes declines with income. Replacing the gasoline tax with a household-level VMT tax would increase the average tax burden on households in the top income and expenditure deciles, because of their greater use of hybrid-electric and battery-electric vehicles. This progressive shift would be small given current levels of hybrid and electric vehicle ownership, but will be larger in the future if such vehicles continue to be more common among higher- than lower-income households. An expanded commercial VMT would place a larger burden, as a share of expenditures, on lower-income or lower-expenditure households, because better-off households consume more nontradable goods that do not require transportation. User charges for airports, subways, and commuter rail are progressive, and bus fees loom much larger for lower-income households.
Suggested Citation
Edward L. Glaeser & Caitlin S. Gorback & James M. Poterba, 2023.
"How Regressive Are Mobility-Related User Fees and Gasoline Taxes?,"
Tax Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 37(1), pages 1-56.
Handle:
RePEc:ucp:tpolec:doi:10.1086/724352
DOI: 10.1086/724352
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:tpolec:doi:10.1086/724352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/TPE .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.