IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/scerev/doi10.1086-686475.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

If Hayek and Coase Were Environmentalists: Linking Economics and Ecology

Author

Listed:
  • Terry L. Anderson

Abstract

Modern environmentalism and neoclassical economics have much in common, but unfortunately the commonalities too often cloud how markets and the environment can be productively linked. The commonalities most often focus on the conditions for equilibrium in ecosystems and economies and on how human action thwarts both systems from achieving equilibrium. A more realistic link between the two disciplines should focus on the dynamic nature of ecosystems and economies. That link depends on property rights and markets to harness entrepreneurship for the purpose of connecting human demand on nature's bounty with dynamic natural forces. The purpose of this Article is to provide a way of reconciling environmentalism and markets. It criticizes the equilibrium approach to ecology and economics because it misses the dynamic connection between nature and human action.1 A better alternative for linking ecology with economics builds on the teachings of Nobel laureates Friedrich Hayek and Ronald Coase regarding the role of prices, property rights, and transaction costs in guiding human action.

Suggested Citation

  • Terry L. Anderson, 2015. "If Hayek and Coase Were Environmentalists: Linking Economics and Ecology," Supreme Court Economic Review, University of Chicago Press, vol. 23(1), pages 121-140.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:scerev:doi:10.1086/686475
    DOI: 10.1086/686475
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686475
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/686475
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/686475?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:scerev:doi:10.1086/686475. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/SCER .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.