IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/scerev/doi10.1086-664559.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Law and Economics of Online vs. Traditional Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Geoffrey A. Manne
  • Joshua D. Wright

Abstract

This symposium features papers from the third (and final) conference in the George Mason Law School/Microsoft conference series on the law and economics of innovation. The papers focus on the law and economics of online markets. There are, of course, obvious differences between the local grocery store and eBay, and between Google and the local Yellow Pages. The conference was convened to bring together scholars, regulators, policy experts and industry insiders to explore the nature of those differences and their implications, if any, for how online markets are organized and regulated. As reflected in these papers, our understanding of the functioning of online markets can be bolstered by an applied understanding of certain economic issues common to most markets. Most important for online markets among these are the economics of information and advertising, the economics of reputation and anonymity, the role of market norms, contract law and other institutions in governing relationships, the economics of networks, and the law and economics of intellectual property. To some extent all of these papers, and almost all discussions of online markets, take on the fundamental question of “online exceptionality”: do the essential characteristics of online markets render them different, susceptible to particular, identifiable abuses or defects, and thus amenable to more-intrusive or more-targeted regulation?

Suggested Citation

  • Geoffrey A. Manne & Joshua D. Wright, 2011. "The Law and Economics of Online vs. Traditional Markets," Supreme Court Economic Review, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(1), pages 1-10.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:scerev:doi:10.1086/664559
    DOI: 10.1086/664559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/664559
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/664559
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/664559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:scerev:doi:10.1086/664559. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/SCER .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.