IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/mresec/doi10.1086-713437.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Should Fishing Quotas Be Measured in Terms of Numbers?

Author

Listed:
  • Max T. Stoeven
  • Florian K. Diekert
  • Martin F. Quaas

Abstract

Whereas rights-based catch regulations such as individual transferable quotas (ITQs) are gaining traction as the key management instrument in many fisheries, most fisheries are additionally regulated by gear restrictions, minimum landing sizes, and similar measures that intend to protect young fish from being caught. Here we study the incentives to fish selectively in a second-best setting, where the regulator issues quotas of different types and fishers choose the size of the fish they catch. We find that if quotas are specified in terms of the number of fish, rather than biomass or weight, fishers have substantial incentives to target larger fish. Thus juvenile fish are protected without need for gear restrictions. We develop the economic principles in an analytical model and quantify results for empirical examples. We find that steady-state profits under second-best deregulated number quota management are only 0.1%–2.1% below the first-best optimum.

Suggested Citation

  • Max T. Stoeven & Florian K. Diekert & Martin F. Quaas, 2021. "Should Fishing Quotas Be Measured in Terms of Numbers?," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 36(2), pages 133-153.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:mresec:doi:10.1086/713437
    DOI: 10.1086/713437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/713437
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/713437
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/713437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Diekert, Florian & Eymess, Tillmann & Goeschl, Timo & Gómez-Cardona, Santiago & Luomba, Joseph, 2022. "Subsidizing Compliance: A Multi-Unit Price List Mechanism for Legal Fishing Nets at Lake Victoria," Working Papers 0711, University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:mresec:doi:10.1086/713437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/MRE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.