IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/v30y2001i2p669-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In the Eye of the Storm: A Regulator's Perspective on Managed Care Organization Liability

Author

Listed:
  • Shapo, Nathaniel S

Abstract

The basic cost control mechanisms of managed care are under assault in the courts through vicarious liability suits and class actions. This response to Richard Epstein and Alan Sykes provides a regulator's practical insights into the judicial regulation of managed care. After briefly establishing the relevance of cost controls in an expensive health care market, the paper describes the author's experience administering the Illinois Managed Care and Patient Rights Act of 1999 and concludes that the regulatory tools provided by that law differ significantly from those sought by plaintiffs in recent lawsuits. The author also places the struggle over patients' rights laws and managed care organization lawsuits in context as the extension of a colossal interest group struggle that resulted when doctors, unable to resolve their differences with insurers at the negotiating table, turned to political and legal solutions for their fundamental problems with the structures of managed care. Copyright 2001 by the University of Chicago.

Suggested Citation

  • Shapo, Nathaniel S, 2001. "In the Eye of the Storm: A Regulator's Perspective on Managed Care Organization Liability," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(2), pages 669-685, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:30:y:2001:i:2:p:669-85
    DOI: 10.1086/342032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/342032
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/342032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:30:y:2001:i:2:p:669-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.