IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/v30y2001i2p615-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Response to David Meltzer's Paper "Hospitalists and the Doctor-Patient Relationship."

Author

Listed:
  • Wachter, Robert M

Abstract

The hospitalist movement, in which a generalist physician assumes the physician-of-record role for hospitalized patients in place of the patients' own primary physician, is transforming American hospital care. Studies, including those by David Meltzer, support the premise that hospitalist care is less expensive and possibly of higher quality than inpatient care provided by primary physicians. Meltzer's survey of randomly selected individuals indicates that, although many would prefer that their own physician orchestrate their inpatient care, relatively few would pay more than $100 for this privilege. This indicates that patient dissatisfaction with the hospitalist model is unlikely to impede its widespread implementation. Hospitalists are just the latest example of the ongoing tension between generalism and specialization in American medicine. The hospitalist--unlike most traditional medical specialists--is actually a generalist by nature whose specialty is defined by the site of care rather than by organ, disease, patient population, or procedure. Copyright 2001 by the University of Chicago.

Suggested Citation

  • Wachter, Robert M, 2001. "Response to David Meltzer's Paper "Hospitalists and the Doctor-Patient Relationship."," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(2), pages 615-623, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:30:y:2001:i:2:p:615-23
    DOI: 10.1086/339296
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/339296
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/339296?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:v:30:y:2001:i:2:p:615-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.