IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-722180.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

When Homemakers Are Compensated: The Effect of Homemaking Provisions on Spousal Time Allocation

Author

Listed:
  • H. Crystal Wong

Abstract

Many argue that the liberalization of divorce laws reduced the commitment value of marriage and thus discouraged the division of labor in a household. I examine how homemaking provisions in marital property law that recognize the contribution of homemakers in the division of marital properties at divorce affects spousal time allocation. Conceivably, such laws could increase the gendered division of labor in a household. I develop a noncooperative household model to analyze the effects of such provisions on spousal time allocation. The empirical findings provide support for the noncooperative household model, particularly under unilateral divorce regimes in which it is difficult for partners to make long-term commitments to each other. The results show that a unilateral divorce regime with a homemaking provision is associated with wives increasing their housework and reducing their market labor.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Crystal Wong, 2023. "When Homemakers Are Compensated: The Effect of Homemaking Provisions on Spousal Time Allocation," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 52(1), pages 107-136.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/722180
    DOI: 10.1086/722180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/722180
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/722180
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/722180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/722180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.