IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-715041.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insolvency Institutions, Pledgeable Assets, and Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Miguel García-Posada

Abstract

This paper models two insolvency institutions—bankruptcy and foreclosure—that financially distressed firms may use and analyzes their effects on firms’ ex ante capital and asset structure decisions. A firm chooses between secured debt (which is easy to foreclose on) and unsecured debt (which is hard to foreclose on and more likely to lead to bankruptcy) according to the trade-off between two inefficiency costs, those from inefficient liquidations and those from productive inefficiencies. This trade-off occurs because firms may overinvest in pledgeable assets to increase their assets’ liquidation value, which reduces funding costs. This overinvestment generates productive inefficiencies but reduces the cost of inefficient liquidations. As foreclosure (a more creditor-friendly procedure than bankruptcy) has a better liquidation technology, firms have incentives to overinvest in pledgeable assets when they expect to use it in the case of default, at the expense of productive inefficiencies and more inefficient liquidations than under bankruptcy.

Suggested Citation

  • Miguel García-Posada, 2021. "Insolvency Institutions, Pledgeable Assets, and Efficiency," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 50(2), pages 331-378.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/715041
    DOI: 10.1086/715041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/715041
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/715041
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/715041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/715041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.