IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-708671.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Disagreement and Capital Structure Complexity

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth Ayotte

Abstract

Corporate bankruptcies often involve complicated, fragmented capital structures with many layers of debt and legal entity structures with many subsidiaries. Why do capital structures evolve this way, given that they make distress more costly to resolve? I suggest an answer based in investor disagreement about the value of assets that back loans. When investors disagree, firms have the incentive to exploit the disagreement by issuing asset-backed claims to optimists about those assets. This capital structure fragmentation minimizes the borrower’s cost of funds ex ante by maximizing creditors’ perceived recoveries, but it also creates costly valuation disputes in bankruptcy. I show that disagreement about collateral values can cause inefficient liquidations. Reorganization, in which prebankruptcy creditors receive securities in the ongoing firm, allows parties to agree to disagree about the value of their entitlements. This promotes settlement and reduces costly litigation over valuation relative to a going-concern sale for cash.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth Ayotte, 2020. "Disagreement and Capital Structure Complexity," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 49(1), pages 1-32.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/708671
    DOI: 10.1086/708671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/708671
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/708671
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/708671?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/708671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.