IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-705538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Field Preemption: Opening the “Gates of Escape” from Tort Law

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine M. Sharkey

Abstract

Framing Richard Epstein’s case for field preemption as a means of compensating for systemic errors of tort law rather than an outgrowth of his broader views on constitutional law shows that his critique of the agency reference model is overdetermined. That model incorporates principles of administrative law into courts’ preemption decision-making framework. Evidence that courts are equipped to scrutinize the administrative regulatory record in deciding whether failure-to-warn or design defect claims are preempted matters not to Epstein, given his preference for wholesale eradication of such claims. Products liability claims may be the wrong target. The rise of federal preemption stunted the evolution of more restrictive state law standards like section 6(c) of Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability. Field preemption is as much to blame as expansionist products liability law for perpetuating the need for a gate of escape from poorly developed concepts of tort liability against prescription drug manufacturers.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine M. Sharkey, 2021. "Field Preemption: Opening the “Gates of Escape” from Tort Law," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 50(S2), pages 27-52.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/705538
    DOI: 10.1086/705538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/705538
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/705538
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/705538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/705538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.