IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jlstud/doi10.1086-694749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guest Worker Programs and Reasonable, Feasible Cosmopolitanism

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Arneson

Abstract

The presence of guest workers in affluent countries poses difficulties for social justice theories. Allowing badly off foreigners to enter and take temporary employment, even on harsh terms, seems morally desirable on grounds of benefits to the entrants. However such policies also seem to be exploitative and to make social relations within the affluent country less just. A noncosmopolitan theory of justice that imposes higher standards on the treatment of insiders than of outsiders will tend to oppose guest worker programs, as will a theory of justice that gives priority to relational equality. A cosmopolitan theory of justice gives equal weight to benefits achieved for anyone anywhere, whether the ones benefited are insiders or outsiders. Such a theory, especially one that tilts toward equality, might appear too readily accepting of guest worker programs and their expansion. This essay argues that the cosmopolitan egalitarian views strike the right balance.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Arneson, 2018. "Guest Worker Programs and Reasonable, Feasible Cosmopolitanism," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(S1), pages 169-194.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/694749
    DOI: 10.1086/694749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694749
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/694749
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/694749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jlstud:doi:10.1086/694749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JLS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.