IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jhucap/doi10.1086-718461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Overeducation and R&D: Theoretical Aspects and Empirical Evidence

Author

Listed:
  • Marco Di Cintio

Abstract

This work introduces R&D firms to a matching model to investigate their effect on overeducation. Moreover, we have enriched the empirical literature on the relationship between overeducation and R&D by evaluating whether the introduction of a tax credit to the R&D expenditures of Italian firms affected the PhDs’ probability of being overeducated. Our results first highlight that overeducation may be consistent with a share of graduate individuals who may be either lower (tightness dominance scenario) or higher (composition dominance scenario) than that optimally required by a social planner. Second, our model shows that the R&D incentives may decrease the likelihood of mismatches.

Suggested Citation

  • Marco Di Cintio, 2022. "Overeducation and R&D: Theoretical Aspects and Empirical Evidence," Journal of Human Capital, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(2), pages 183-232.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jhucap:doi:10.1086/718461
    DOI: 10.1086/718461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/718461
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/718461
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/718461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jhucap:doi:10.1086/718461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JHC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.