IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-722702.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Racial Regard and Black Consumers’ Responses to Stigmatized-Identity Cues

Author

Listed:
  • Tracy Rank-Christman
  • David Wooten

Abstract

This research leverages important concepts from the multidimensional model of racial identity (Sellers et al. 1998) to advance knowledge of intragroup differences in Black consumers’ responses to stigmatized-identity cues. The authors propose that the discrepancy between private and public racial regard moderates the impact of stigmatized-identity cues on Black consumers’ reactions to the cue source. Private regard reflects how individuals feel about their Black racial identity, whereas public regard captures individuals’ beliefs about how others perceive Black people. Findings from three experiments suggest that a favorable discrepancy between private and public racial regard magnifies the impact of stigmatized-identity cues on Black consumers’ perceptions and intentions with respect to the cue source. Feeling respected mediates this relationship.

Suggested Citation

  • Tracy Rank-Christman & David Wooten, 2023. "Racial Regard and Black Consumers’ Responses to Stigmatized-Identity Cues," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 8(1), pages 21-32.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/722702
    DOI: 10.1086/722702
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/722702
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/722702
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/722702?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/722702. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.