IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-720448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Eating: Bridging the Gap between “Lab Eating” and “Free-Living Eating”

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly L. Haws
  • Peggy J. Liu
  • Brent McFerran
  • Pierre Chandon

Abstract

Food consumption and its physiological, psychological, and social antecedents and outcomes have received considerable attention in research across many disciplines, including consumer research. Although researchers use various methods to examine food decision making, many insights generated stem from observing eating choices in tightly controlled lab settings. Although much insight can be gained through such studies (or “lab eating”), it is apparent that many factors differ between such settings and everyday consumption (or “free-living eating”). This article highlights key differences between lab eating and free-living eating, discusses ways in which such differences matter, and provides recommendations for researchers regarding how and when to narrow the gap between them, including by enriching lab studies in ways inspired by free-living eating. Besides suggesting how researchers can conduct studies offering a deeper understanding of eating patterns, we also highlight practical implications for improving food consumption for consumers, marketers, and policy makers.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly L. Haws & Peggy J. Liu & Brent McFerran & Pierre Chandon, 2022. "Examining Eating: Bridging the Gap between “Lab Eating” and “Free-Living Eating”," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(4), pages 403-418.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/720448
    DOI: 10.1086/720448
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/720448
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/720448
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/720448?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shilpa Madan & Gita Venkataramani Johar & Jonah Berger & Pierre Chandon & Rajesh Chandy & Rebecca Hamilton & Leslie K. John & Aparna A. Labroo & Peggy J. Liu & John G. Lynch & Nina Mazar & Nicole L. M, 2023. "Reaching for rigor and relevance: better marketing research for a better world," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 34(1), pages 1-12, March.
    2. repec:oup:jconrs:v:49:y:2023:i:5:p:926-939. is not listed on IDEAS

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/720448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.