IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-719578.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic Conservatism Predicts Preference for Automated Products

Author

Listed:
  • Eugene Y. Chan
  • Gavin Northey
  • Sylvie Borau

Abstract

There may be two distinct dimensions of conservative political ideology, namely, economic conservatism and social conservatism. Investigating the implications of this for consumer behavior, we posit that economic conservatives express a higher preference for automated (but not manual) consumer products because the outputs that automated products produce are predictable and satisfy economic conservatives’ need for predictability. Results from study 1 support our theorizing, with study 2 implicating the role of need for predictability and study 3 ruling out work ethic as a rival mechanism. We obtain inconsistent findings about social conservatism, however. Our results add nuance to the research on political ideology by examining its two distinct dimensions (economic vs. social conservatism) and to the literature on technology adoption by highlighting one other variable that distinguishes automated from manual products (output predictability).

Suggested Citation

  • Eugene Y. Chan & Gavin Northey & Sylvie Borau, 2022. "Economic Conservatism Predicts Preference for Automated Products," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 7(3), pages 287-295.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/719578
    DOI: 10.1086/719578
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/719578
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/719578
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/719578?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/719578. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.