IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-714501.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Web Wizard or Internet Addict? The Effects of Contextual Cues in Assessing Addiction

Author

Listed:
  • Priya Raghubir
  • Geeta Menon
  • I-Ling Ling

Abstract

With the revolution in technology, the internet offers opportunity to be a “web wizard,” but its overuse could be problematic. Problematic internet use, also called internet addiction disorder (IAD), is typically self-diagnosed and has been linked to other comorbidities, such as gambling, alcoholism, and mood disorders. Psychiatrists have not reached agreement on how to define or measure it, and estimates of its prevalence vary widely. Five studies examine how people self-diagnose using the accessibility-diagnosticity model. We propose that risk perceptions are based on at least two inputs: estimated internet use, and IAD symptoms, estimates of both being malleable and contingent on context. Results show that (a) the range-of-response alternatives used to elicit internet usage affects reported internet use affecting risk perceptions; (b) self-risk perceptions are lower when IAD symptoms are elicited prior to risk estimates. We conclude by discussing the implications for context effects and self-diagnosis for health risk assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Priya Raghubir & Geeta Menon & I-Ling Ling, 2021. "Web Wizard or Internet Addict? The Effects of Contextual Cues in Assessing Addiction," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 6(3), pages 362-376.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/714501
    DOI: 10.1086/714501
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/714501
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/714501
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/714501?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/714501. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.