IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-709907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Do I Like My Chances (to Unfold)? Why Perceived Scarcity and Anticipated Hope Lead Consumers to Prefer Increasing Probabilities of Obtaining a Resource

Author

Listed:
  • Julian Givi
  • Christopher Y. Olivola

Abstract

The present work examines consumers’ sequence ordering preferences when they have multiple probabilistic opportunities to obtain a resource. In particular, this research investigates whether consumers with multiple opportunities for resource obtainment prefer to start with the opportunity that is least likely to produce the resource and end with the one that is most likely to do so (i.e., an ascending probability sequence), or instead start with the most likely-to-succeed opportunity and end with the least likely-to-succeed one (i.e., a descending probability sequence). Four studies demonstrate that consumers prefer ascending (vs. descending) probability sequences, because they anticipate that this ordering will make the resource feel relatively less scarce, and therefore engender more hope, over the course of the sequence. Contributions to the literatures on scarcity, hope, and sequence ordering preferences, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Julian Givi & Christopher Y. Olivola, 2020. "How Do I Like My Chances (to Unfold)? Why Perceived Scarcity and Anticipated Hope Lead Consumers to Prefer Increasing Probabilities of Obtaining a Resource," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 5(4), pages 470-484.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/709907
    DOI: 10.1086/709907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/709907
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/709907
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/709907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/709907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.