IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/jacres/doi10.1086-690938.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Let's Get Closer: Feelings of Connectedness from Using Social Media, with Implications for Brand Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Donna L. Hoffman
  • Thomas P. Novak
  • Hyunjin Kang

Abstract

Despite the fact that social media offers consumers opportunities to connect with each other, little work has focused on how what consumers do on social media interacts with why they do it to affect their feelings of connection. Further, the extent to which these social media interactions occur in brand contexts is likely to affect consumers' response to brands and could have important implications for brands' social media marketing efforts. Drawing on regulatory focus theory, we show that the fit conditions of promotion-focused, more social behaviors and prevention-focused, less social behaviors produce higher feelings of connection compared to the nonfit conditions, owing to a subjective sensation that the fit conditions just feel right. We also show that when these fit conditions occur in brand-related contexts, they produce stronger feelings of connection toward the brand and more positive responses to the brand's social media marketing efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Donna L. Hoffman & Thomas P. Novak & Hyunjin Kang, 2017. "Let's Get Closer: Feelings of Connectedness from Using Social Media, with Implications for Brand Outcomes," Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(2), pages 216-228.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/690938
    DOI: 10.1086/690938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/690938
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/690938
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/690938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jacres:doi:10.1086/690938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/JACR .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.