IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-723764.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Seeking the Shelter of Governments: The Unintended Consequence of Environmental Regulation on Firm Ownership Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Ni Qin
  • Dongmin Kong

Abstract

We examine the causal effect of environmental regulation on firm ownership dynamics. China’s central government took the reduction of sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions as the main performance evaluation criterion for local government leaders in 2005. Based on a difference-in-differences framework, our results show that environmental regulation increases firms’ state shareholdings, and these findings are robust to various endogeneity and sensitivity analyses. In particular, stringent regulations increase firms’ production costs, thus reducing their expected profits and causing undue burden on them. As a result, firms seek the shelter of governments by introducing more state shareholdings to escape stricter environmental regulations or to obtain invisible benefits. Our results are more significant in regions with low corruption, high transparency, or poor external business environments and highly polluting firms.

Suggested Citation

  • Ni Qin & Dongmin Kong, 2024. "Seeking the Shelter of Governments: The Unintended Consequence of Environmental Regulation on Firm Ownership Dynamics," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(3), pages 1391-1423.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/723764
    DOI: 10.1086/723764
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/723764
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/723764
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/723764?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/723764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.