IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-723492.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incentives to Improve Government Agricultural Extension Agent Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Md. Rajibul Alam
  • Yoko Kijima

Abstract

This study provides empirical evidence on how financial and nonfinancial incentives improve service delivery of government agricultural extension agents. A randomized controlled trial was conducted in 40 subdistrict agriculture offices in Bangladesh, with 807 agricultural extension officers, randomly allocated into five groups (one control and four treatment). The financial incentive was a one-time monetary reward, while the nonfinancial incentive was recognition by the district director. In the nonfinancial incentive treatment, we added another treatment in which the two worst performers, instead of best, are selected for inspection. In the financial incentive, we created another treatment where the best performer is selected based on performance level. We find that financial and nonfinancial incentives have positive effects of equal magnitude, about 1 standard deviation of total performance index on average. Giving a disadvantage to better performers does not decrease effort by better performers.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. Rajibul Alam & Yoko Kijima, 2024. "Incentives to Improve Government Agricultural Extension Agent Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Bangladesh," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(3), pages 1295-1316.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/723492
    DOI: 10.1086/723492
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/723492
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/723492
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/723492?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/723492. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.