IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/ecdecc/doi10.1086-721907.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study for Nothing? Gender and Access to Higher Education in a Developing Country

Author

Listed:
  • Oswaldo Molina
  • Diego Santa María
  • Gustavo Yamada

Abstract

We show that the gap in access to higher education between female children at the bottom and at the top of the distribution of household wealth in Peru is greater than among males, and we estimate a structural model of skill formation to assess whether skill development can explain these differences. Our results indicate that boys and girls exhibit similar skill endowments toward the end of their secondary education but experience different returns to skills in terms of access to higher education. Cognitive skills are strong predictors of enrollment for both genders, but noncognitive skills matter only for boys. We also find evidence of gender-specific constraints associated with wealth: while skills explain the majority of the difference in access to higher education between males at the bottom and at the top of the wealth distribution, the female gap in enrollment remains large even after accounting for these factors. Further analysis shows that female children appear to be disproportionately sensitive to the accessibility of higher education. We discuss possible interpretations of this result.

Suggested Citation

  • Oswaldo Molina & Diego Santa María & Gustavo Yamada, 2024. "Study for Nothing? Gender and Access to Higher Education in a Developing Country," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 72(2), pages 517-561.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/721907
    DOI: 10.1086/721907
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/721907
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/721907
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/721907?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:ecdecc:doi:10.1086/721907. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/EDCC .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.