IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ucp/amjhec/doi10.1086-723541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Roles of Cost and Recommendations in Driving Vaccine Take-Up

Author

Listed:
  • Brandyn F. Churchill
  • Laura E. Henkhaus

Abstract

Vaccination has been called one of the greatest public health success stories, yet little is known about how to successfully increase adult vaccination rates. Analyzing shingles vaccination, we show that 60-year-olds—who were recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices to receive the vaccine—were no more likely to be vaccinated than their 59-year-old counterparts prior to the Affordable Care Act. After the ACA’s preventive services provision required private insurance plans to cover recommended vaccines without patient cost-sharing, adults aged 60 or older were more likely to receive the vaccine, and we document a similar increase for 50- to 59-year-olds after the recommendation age was lowered to 50. Because shingles is not a communicable disease, the benefits of vaccination are largely internalized. After accounting for the $6,000 medical and productivity savings associated with preventing a shingles episode, back-of-the-envelope calculations imply adults would have to price the leisure costs at $22,000 per episode for the coverage increase to have been welfare neutral.

Suggested Citation

  • Brandyn F. Churchill & Laura E. Henkhaus, 2023. "The Roles of Cost and Recommendations in Driving Vaccine Take-Up," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 9(4), pages 523-551.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucp:amjhec:doi:10.1086/723541
    DOI: 10.1086/723541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/723541
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/723541
    Download Restriction: Access to the online full text or PDF requires a subscription.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1086/723541?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:amjhec:doi:10.1086/723541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journals Division (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/AJHE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.