IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stataj/v17y2017i1p208-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

biasplot: A package to effective plots to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Taffé

    (Institute for Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Lausanne)

  • Mingkai Peng

    (University of Calgary)

  • Vicki Stagg

    (Calgary Statistical Support)

  • Tyler Williamson

    (University of Calgary)

Abstract

Bland and Altman’s (1986, Lancet 327: 307–310) limits of agreement have been used in many clinical research settings to assess agreement between two methods of measuring a quantitative characteristic. However, when the variances of the measurement errors of the two methods differ, limits of agreement can be misleading. biasplot implements a new statistical methodology that Taff ́e (Forthcoming, Statistical Methods in Medical Research) recently developed to circumvent this issue and assess bias and precision of the two measurement methods (one is the reference standard, and the other is the new measurement method to be evaluated). biasplot produces three new plots introduced by Taffé: the “bias plot”, “precision plot”, and “comparison plot”. These help the investigator visually evaluate the performance of the new measurement method. In this article, we introduce the user-written command biasplot and present worked examples using simulated data included with the package. Note that the Taffé method assumes there are several measurements from the reference standard and possibly as few as one measurement from the new method for each individual.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Taffé & Mingkai Peng & Vicki Stagg & Tyler Williamson, 2017. "biasplot: A package to effective plots to assess bias and precision in method comparison studies," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 17(1), pages 208-221, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:17:y:2017:i:1:p:208-221
    Note: to access software from within Stata, net describe http://www.stata-journal.com/software/sj17-1/gr0068/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.stata-journal.com/article.html?article=gr0068
    File Function: link to article purchase
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oke Gerke & Sören Möller, 2021. "Bland–Altman Limits of Agreement from a Bayesian and Frequentist Perspective," Stats, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tsj:stataj:v:17:y:2017:i:1:p:208-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum or Lisa Gilmore (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.stata-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.