The Small-Sample Bias of the Gini Coefficient: Results and Implications for Empirical Research
AbstractThe Gini coefficient is a downward-biased measure of inequality in small populations when income is generated by one of three common distributions. The paper discusses the sources of bias and argues that this property is far more general. This has implications for (i) the comparison of inequality among subsamples, some of which may be small, and (ii) the use of the Gini in measuring firm size inequality in markets with a small number of firms. The small-sample bias has often led to misperceptions about trends in industry concentration. A small-sample adjustment results in a reduced bias, which can no longer be signed. This remaining bias rises with the dispersion and falls with increasing skewness of the distribution. Finally, an empirical example illustrates the importance of using the adjusted Gini. In this example it is shown that, controlling for market characteristics, larger shipping cartels include a set of firms that is stochastically identical (in terms of relative size) to those of smaller shipping cartels. © 2003 President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Download InfoIf you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
Bibliographic InfoArticle provided by MIT Press in its journal Review of Economics and Statistics.
Volume (Year): 85 (2003)
Issue (Month): 1 (February)
Contact details of provider:
Web page: http://mitpress.mit.edu/journals/
You can help add them by filling out this form.
CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Russell Davidson, 2009.
"Reliable inference for the GINI Index,"
Working Papers, HAL
- Heshmati, Almas, 2004. "Data Issues and Databases Used in Analysis of Growth, Poverty and Economic Inequality," IZA Discussion Papers 1263, Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA).
- James Alm & Yongzheng Liu, 2014.
"China's Tax-for-Fee Reform and Village Inequality,"
Oxford Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals,
Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 38-64, March.
- James Alm & Yongzheng Liu, 2013. "China's Tax-for-Fee Reform and Village Inequality," Working Papers, Tulane University, Department of Economics 1304, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
- Wodon, Quentin & Yitzhaki, Shlomo, 2003. "The effect of using grouped data on the estimation of the Gini income elasticity," Economics Letters, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 153-159, February.
- Kaja Bonesmo Fredriksen, 2012. "Income Inequality in the European Union," OECD Economics Department Working Papers, OECD Publishing 952, OECD Publishing.
- Billings, Stephen B. & Johnson, Erik B., 2012. "The location quotient as an estimator of industrial concentration," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 642-647.
- Andrew J. Cassey & Ben O. Smith, 2012.
"Simulating Confidence for the Ellison-Glaeser Index,"
Working Papers, School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University
2012-8, School of Economic Sciences, Washington State University.
- Cassey, Andrew J. & Smith, Ben O., 2014. "Simulating confidence for the Ellison–Glaeser index," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 85-103.
- César Martinelli & Rich Sicotte, 2004.
"Voting in Cartels: Theory and Evidence from the Shipping Industry,"
122247000000000598, UCLA Department of Economics.
- Cesar Martinelli & Richard Sicotte, 2004. "Voting in Cartels: Theory and Evidence from the Shipping Industry," Working Papers, Centro de Investigacion Economica, ITAM 0404, Centro de Investigacion Economica, ITAM, revised 05 Mar 2004.
- Amlan Majumder & Takayoshi Kusago, 2013. "A discreet approach to study the distribution-free downward biases of Gini coefficient and the methods of correction in cases of small observations," Working Papers, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality 298, ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality.
- Thomas Demuynck, 2012.
"An (almost) unbiased estimator for the S-Gini index,"
Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer,
Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 109-126, March.
- T. Demuynck, 2009. "An (almost) unbiased estimator for the S-Gini index," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration 09/569, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
- Tom Van Ourti & Philip Clarke, 2008. "The Bias of the Gini Coefficient due to Grouping," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers, Tinbergen Institute 08-095/3, Tinbergen Institute.
- David E. Giles, 2005. "The Bias of Inequality Measures in Very Small Samples: Some Analytic Results," Econometrics Working Papers, Department of Economics, University of Victoria 0514, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Karie Kirkpatrick).
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.